London— Indian cricket superstar Virat Kohli is once again making headlines, but not for anything he did on the pitch. This time, it was his appearance at the iconic Wimbledon tennis tournament that got fans and social media buzzing.
Currently on a break from cricket, Kohli was spotted in the stands of Wimbledon’s Centre Court, looking dapper in a white blazer, sunglasses, and his signature classy style. While several global celebrities were in attendance, it was Kohli who stole the spotlight.
However, his appearance didn’t sit well with everyone. Some social media users questioned his presence at such an event so soon after India’s recent cricket struggles, asking, “Should cricketers be out enjoying themselves after the team’s loss?”
In response, many fans and former players came to Kohli’s defense, sparking a broader debate: “Can’t a cricketer enjoy a match in peace?” After all, Wimbledon is one of the world’s premier sporting events, and Kohli is a known sports enthusiast.
The controversy has once again highlighted the intense scrutiny that public figures, especially sportspersons, face in India. Does being a cricketer mean being on duty 24/7, with no room for personal time?
Kohli hasn’t responded to the criticism, but his graceful appearance at Wimbledon shows that he continues to be a trendsetter not just on the field, but off it too.
So the question remains: Can a cricketer not watch a match in peace without being judged? The conversation is open.